This week we looked at PLE (Personal Learning Environment). Our task was then to consider our own individual personal learning environment. A PKM (Personal Knowledge Management) example by Urs Frei best suits my own PLE. Frei considers the following steps; retrieving, evaluating, organizing, analyzing, composing, presenting, publishing and dialog. When I have an assignment to do firstly I retrieve all the information I can find in concern to the topic of the assignment. I first do this by going to the library to get books or read things from Special Collections such as a thesis. I then check the Internet and check Jstor and search on Google. I was not aware of Google Scholar until this week in class! With all this information I then evaluate its importance and relevance to my assignment and organize the information into sections which would form my paragraphs. I then analyze the information in relation to the question I was set. I consider the information and my own view on the subject. I then compose a first draft of my assignment in the shape of an introduction, main body and conclusion. I then present the final draft and await the feedback from the lecturer which may then help me improve in my next assignment as I could learn where I could do better in different areas.
'how do they improve their practice, learn from each other, and continue to improve on overwhelmingly complex tasks?..We didn't hire smart people so we could tell them what to do; we hired them to tell us what to do.' This is an important point made in a piece written by Yasmin Fodil. It basically states the benefits of learning from each other. I can first consider what I know from experience. I can reflect upon my past experiences which allows me to build on each assignment, learn from each one and improve. I can consider what everyone around me knows and then join these together, it is said after all that two minds are better then one. A definition offered for Knowledge Management is 'better application of collective knowledge to the individual problem. So we need to develop some systems and do a little more work to share collective knowledge and make us smarter.' This is important to note as the more minds that discuss a problem give a better insight to it as we can learn from each other.
'One of the great benefits of using social media as a KM tool is that you are creating and capturing the knowledge at the same time. However, in order for this to truly work people have to be willing to collaborate in the open throughout the project lifecycle...If you share what you know and what you don't know in the middle of a project, you give people an opportunity to share specific knowledge that can help you in the moment.' I think this is very important. I did not realise the benefits of using social media as a tool until doing this course. I was not even aware of all the resources which are out there for people to avail of. 'Sometimes learning in public is a difficult process, but the feedback, support, and resultant improvements are worth it.' I think this is true, starting out in this can prove to be a difficult process but overtime one would reap the awards of it. Before making this blog I did not have a blog, therefore it was new to me. I now realise that by following peoples blogs one can learn from other people and pick up useful bits of information as well as perhaps discovering links to other places of interest.
'In a nutshell: Communities of practice are groups of people who share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly.' Wenger stated this circa 2007. Our own small class in Digital History can be described like this as a community of practice where by we share a common interest in history in general, and a majority interest in Irish media history and journalism. Thus by working together we could learn from each other. Vygotsky shares a similar view. 'Social interactions plays a fundamental role in the development of cognition...Every function in the child's cultural development appears twice: first, on the social level, and later, on the individual level; first, between people (interpsychological) and then inside the child (intrapsychological). This applies equally to voluntary attention, to logical memory, and to the formation of concepts. All the higher functions originate as actual relationships between individuals...the idea that the potential for cognitive development depends upon the "zone of proximal development" (ZPP)...The range of skill that can be developed with adult guidance or peer collaboration exceeds what can be attained alone.'
The point he concludes on here is what is most important that by collaborating we can achieve more than by working alone. Having done this course and this task in particular in future I shall use more social tools as sources of learning. I will do so as I am now aware of what is actually available to me and that they are actually quite easy to access if the tools are used properly and to their best affect.
http://www.govloop.com/profiles/blogs/how-do-rocket-scientists-learn
http://www.infed.org/biblio/communities_of_practice.htm
http://tip.psychology.org/vygotsky.html




